Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

worldwide drugstorepremarin with worldwide shipping valtrex canadaand Im buy in online pharmacy and bactrim generic and clomid new zealand no rx.viagra australia without prescription. And you can order propecia best of medications arimidex
Dan Schnur

Alternative Budget Needed — Now

Over the last months of budget negotiations, there has not been evidence of a proposal forwarded by a state legislator of either party that reduces spending by the $40 billion necessary to balance the budget without a sizable tax increase. If that proposal exists, it has not benefited from sufficiently wide support from that legislator’s colleagues to become part of the budget debate.

Because of a lack of an alternative that balances the budget solely through spending cuts, it’s been apparent for some time that the final budget agreement will ultimately involve a considerable amount of additional taxes. That’s not a good thing, but it’s a thing. So at this point, Republicans have two options: either continue the stalemate indefinitely or propose that alternate budget. The lack of a state government holds great ideological appeal, but creates practical difficulties. So the question is: where is that alternative budget and the plan for building public and political support for it?

The budget before the Legislature is no cause for celebration. It’s unlikely that the Republican leaders who have been part of the negotiations – Schwarzenegger, Villines and Cogdill – will receive any congratulations. But they do not deserve castigation either, and in fact, should receive some credit for convincing the large Democratic majorities to offer concessions on a series of budget reforms, rainy day funds, job-creation incentives and regulatory relief that can help mitigate the damage that $14 billion in tax increases are likely to cause.

Thursday’s Capitol Weekly outlined several of the victories that Schwarzenegger and the GOP legislative leaders achieved.  In a state with a Republican majority, these reforms would have been achieved long ago. But until that majority is achieved, this tradeoff appears to be the only way to restrain state government from continuing this ridiculous cycle of boom-and-bust budgeting that has characterized the last several years of fiscal irresponsibility in the State Capitol.

The overwhelming majority of Republican legislators will vote against this budget on principle. That’s fine. But the handful who support it should not be condemned – at least not by anyone who has not published a complete list of $40 billion in recommended spending reductions. Opponents of this bill will be able to speak with much more credibility in the future if they produce that list before voting begins later today.

One Response to “Alternative Budget Needed — Now”

  1. marksheppard@verizon.net Says:

    Mr. Schnur:

    I may not be as smart or “statesman”-like as you, and I may note have a “specific” budget to offer, but I do know the following:

    1) California’s state government has grown by an average of 48 jobs/day since 1999.

    2) K-12 spending continues to go up in spite of declining enrollment.

    3) the number of state employees that make more than $200K/year has grown exponentially since Arnold took office, and the number of state employees making in excess of $100K has also markedly increased.

    4) the service that I and every (legal) resident receives from the state has not gotten any better for all the extra spending.

    and finally:

    5) if this steaming pile of crap called a compromise passes, I will never vote for another Republican candidate for anything in California.

    NO MORE MONEY OUT OF MY POCKET AND INTO THE BUREAUCRATIC SINKHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!