Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

Matt Rexroad

Redistricting — Congresswoman Bono Mack

Every ten years after the census is taken, America’s political fault lines shift during the process of redistricting. Whole political districts can be swallowed by massive population shifts or in other cases political districts emerge unscathed.

Although we don’t have complete census data we can tell where the state is growing and have some rough numbers.   It is clear where the political fault lines will shift the most.

In California, voters rewrote the rules for how state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn in order to remove politics from the process. Instead of politicians drawing district boundaries, an independent citizen commission will determine the new district lines.

California’s new process of redistricting will likely result in some districts being entirely redrawing with new boundaries. For example, the district currently held by Congresswoman Lois Capps cannot exist under a plan drawn by the independent commission because it can’t possibly be justified with the new criteria.

On the other hand, the new redistricting process may have significant effects on other districts without the need to redraw the entire district boundaries. This could be the case for Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack’s district. The east side of her district is the state line and for most of the district the north and south boundaries are the Riverside County border.  So it is possible that three sides of Congresswoman Bono Mack’s district are already determined.

The west boundary is where it gets complicated.  Each Congressional district will have about 700,000 residents.  Let’s assume that the Bono Mack seat stays only in Riverside County.   With the high growth rate in the desert over the past decade the current 45th Congressional district has more than 900,000 residents.  This district will need to shrink about 200,000 residents.

So the important question is what 200,000 residents will this district lose.  Surely the Congresswoman would benefit from removing Palm Springs.  Palm Springs is a liberal island in a conservative sea in the Inland Empire. Yet it would be hard to imagine that a district that needs to lose 200,000 would see them come anywhere but off the western edges of the district probably making it less Republican.

So who benefits from the Republican on the west side of the county getting taken out of the current Bono district?  Assemblyman Victor Manuel Perez is sitting right there anxious to see the new lines that just might give him a good shot at a seat in Congress.  So is Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet.  He ran against Bono Mack in November and has the ability to raise large sums of money with a nationwide network.

Another option for mapmakers would be to go south to include Imperial County but that is not a good choice for any Republican – but would be welcomed by Perez.  This is a county that traditionally supports a candidate with a Latino surname yet San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom beat Lt. Governor Abel Maldonado by more than 6 points.  Every Republican statewide candidate lost this county by a large number in the November election.

The possible options as a result of this census data are limitless.  However, a few things are starting to clear up just based on the facts at hand — some Republican members of Congress are going to be in jeopardy once these new districts come out of the redistricting commission.

 

3 Responses to “Redistricting — Congresswoman Bono Mack”

  1. dstout4@hotmail.com Says:

    But, some Democratic members will be in jeopardy as well. It is hard to see how things could get worse than they are now — currently there are 33 D’s and 20 R’s. That means that 62% of Californians are represented by a Democrat, and only 38% by a Republican (assuming equal district populations, which of course is not currently true). Even with the horrendous 2010 election results, the electorate is not that disparate

  2. soldsoon@aol.com Says:

    Gosh….what enlightenment….the moochers are like locusts and you moan about representation….when you throw about 15 million moochers in the air what do you expect to come down…..Stepford Wives and Barry Goldwaters????

    Until you broaden the tax base to really get the moochers’ attention on the cost of services they demand from the Commissars…..no arranging the deck chairs will ever help… California is like the Titanic…it already has hit the “berg”.

  3. Arrowhead.Ken@Charter.Net Says:

    Yes, Tax the moochers! That is actually the best idea out there.
    A flat tax that is imposed on ALL income earners is the smart and fair way to go. When the moochers ( non tax payers) have to pay money to exist, they will be less hard on the system and start voting for people who want to limit taxation.

    This redistricting thing sounds great, but will ever actually survive challenges with out becoming another political football?

    If redistricting is not completed and adopted by the due date, it will in turn create a mine field of unintended consequences.