Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

Richard Rider

Indian and Chinese U.S. immigration EACH are higher than Hispanic immigration

Conservatives who oppose immigration (legal and illegal) lament that such new arrivals vote lockstep for Democrats.  It’s never been “lockstep,” but it’s true that overall Hispanics DO vote Democrat much more frequently vs. Republican.Gosh, Hispanics vote against people who rave about (or fail to speak out against) deporting 11 million Hispanics.  Stunning.

But what has been missed by the immigration opposition has been the pronounced change in the country’s immigration pattern this past decade.  Today the combined Chinese and (Asian) Indian immigration — legal and illegal — easily outpaces all Hispanic migration to the U.S.  Indeed, EACH Asian group now outpaces Hispanic immigration.

And guess what?  Chinese and Indians have fiscally conservative values — and constitute good hunting grounds for Republican candidates seeking votes.  They are overwhelmingly CAPITALISTS.

Sadly, our xenophobes are making it clear that — for U.S. nativists (let’s ignore those original Native Americans) — ALL immigrants are unwelcome in America.  An excellent source of pro-U.S. voters is being (sorry) alienated.  It’s a big factor in CA politics.

At any rate, the summary numbers are in the article, which includes some excellent graphics.

SALIENT EXCERPT:
[In 2014] about 136,000 people came to the U.S. from India, about 128,000 from China and about 123,000 from Mexico, census figures show. As recently as 2005, Mexico sent more than 10 times as many people to the U.S. as China, and more than six times as many as India. 
The figures include people who come legally and illegally, but don’t distinguish between the two. While Chinese and Indian immigrants are far more likely to be in the U.S. legally than those from Mexico, Asians represent one of the fastest-growing segments of undocumented immigrants in the country, researchers say. People from Mexico and other Central American countries account for about 71% of the U.S. unauthorized immigrant population, while Asians account for the second-largest share at 13%, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

. . .

http://www.wsj.com/articles/immigration-source-shifts-to-asia-from-mexico-1473205576

WALL ST JOURNAL

Immigration Source Shifts to Asia From Mexico

In most states, arrivals from China or India outpace those from the U.S.’s southern neighbor

By

JANET ADAMY and
PAUL OVERBERG

Updated Sept. 7, 2016 9:15 a.m. ET

Chinese and Indian newcomers to the U.S. are now outpacing Mexican arrivals in most regions of the country, a marked reversal from a decade ago, when immigrants from America’s southern neighbor dwarfed arrivals from the large Asian countries.
A Wall Street Journal analysis of census figures shows that in Illinois, New York, Ohio, Virginia, Florida, Georgia and other states, more immigrants from China and India arrived than from Mexico in 2014, the most recent year for which data are available.
That year, about 136,000 people came to the U.S. from India, about 128,000 from China and about 123,000 from Mexico, census figures show. As recently as 2005, Mexico sent more than 10 times as many people to the U.S. as China, and more than six times as many as India.
The figures include people who come legally and illegally, but don’t distinguish between the two. While Chinese and Indian immigrants are far more likely to be in the U.S. legally than those from Mexico, Asians represent one of the fastest-growing segments of undocumented immigrants in the country, researchers say.. . .

Go to the URL for the complete story and the graphics.