Matthew J. Cunningham

Matt Cunningham is a principal in Pacific Strategies, in Orange County.
Recent Posts
- AG to CalPERS: Divest from Iran Now
- NTLC's Lew Uhler Urges Rejection Of Maldonado As Lt. Governor
- CRA Statement on Maldonado Confirmation Vote
- Slate mailer racks up $84,000 fines
- Projections Moving Faster than the Trains
- Statewide proposition lineup
- Sunday San Diego: Napping in AD 77, Waking in AD 78, CalPERS says Pound Sand on Divestments, and More
- Carly Fiorina On President Reagan's Birthday
- CRP Chairman Nehring's Statement In Response To SacBee Story
- CTA Wants To Divert The "Payoff Benefits" That Got BigBiz Onboard With Higher Taxes, And Divert Them To Thier Own Purposes
Commentary Library
Authors
FR BlogScan
The Lite Guv Intrigue Continues (Source: KQED's Capitol Notes)
February 8 Open Thread (Source: Calitics)
As Some Hesitate, Laird Says He Can Win Maldonado's Seat (Source: Calitics)
The Lite Guv Intrigue Continues (Source: KQED's Capitol Notes)
Recount of Mission Viejo recall announced (Source: OC Register Total Buzz)
If GOP Doesn't Want Maldo as LG, Have a Primary (Source: Dem Majority Report)
Local activist behind impeach Obama site (Source: OC Register Total Buzz)
AG to CalPERS: Divest from Iran Now [By Barry Jantz - San Diego County - Flash Report] (Source: FlashReport)
Go To BlogScan PageFR BlogScan
The Lite Guv Intrigue Continues (Source: KQED's Capitol Notes)
February 8 Open Thread (Source: Calitics)
As Some Hesitate, Laird Says He Can Win Maldonado's Seat (Source: Calitics)
The Lite Guv Intrigue Continues (Source: KQED's Capitol Notes)
Recount of Mission Viejo recall announced (Source: OC Register Total Buzz)
If GOP Doesn't Want Maldo as LG, Have a Primary (Source: Dem Majority Report)
Local activist behind impeach Obama site (Source: OC Register Total Buzz)
AG to CalPERS: Divest from Iran Now [By Barry Jantz - San Diego County - Flash Report] (Source: FlashReport)
Go To BlogScan PagePosts by Month
2010
February ( 45 )January ( 138 )2009
December ( 91 )November ( 104 )October ( 142 )September ( 136 )August ( 115 )July ( 123 )June ( 138 )May ( 132 )April ( 100 )March ( 122 )February ( 214 )January ( 133 )2008
December ( 95 )November ( 119 )October ( 134 )September ( 129 )August ( 176 )July ( 131 )June ( 124 )May ( 165 )April ( 125 )March ( 133 )February ( 200 )January ( 202 )2007
December ( 118 )November ( 126 )October ( 140 )September ( 139 )August ( 166 )July ( 198 )June ( 162 )May ( 136 )April ( 151 )March ( 170 )February ( 184 )January ( 176 )2006
December ( 138 )November ( 222 )October ( 202 )September ( 178 )August ( 179 )July ( 159 )June ( 192 )May ( 247 )April ( 179 )March ( 236 )February ( 219 )January ( 228 )2005
December ( 154 )November ( 161 )October ( 124 )Tips and Leads
Recent Comments
Katie Teague on CRP Chairman Nehring's Statement In Response To SacBee Story
Katie Teague on CRA Statement on Maldonado Confirmation Vote
Robert Bosich on NTLC's Lew Uhler Urges Rejection Of Maldonado As Lt. Governor
Robert Bosich on CRA Statement on Maldonado Confirmation Vote
JIm Lacy on Statewide proposition lineup
Tom Kaptain on Statewide proposition lineup
Larry Urdahl on Money "Trail" in Open Joel Anderson AD 77 Seat
Matt Munson on Statewide proposition lineup
JIm Lacy on Ballot Designation Junkies Get Excited
Cliff Unruh on Rest In Peace Ethie Radanovich
Chris Lauer on Chief of Staff for Senate Republicans Off To PG&E
JIm Lacy on Ballot Designation Junkies Get Excited
Ken Hunter on An Open Letter to Senate Republicans
Howard Epstein on Today's Commentary: South Lake Tahoe Transit Chief Embroiled In Controversy
Sean Loranger on Sheriff's union biggest loser in Mission Viejo recall election
FlashReport Weblog on California Politics
How I Voted
by Matthew J. Cunningham - Orange County (bio) (email)(print)
Prop. 74: Yes
Prop. 75: Yes
Prop. 76: Yes
Prop. 77: Yes
Prop. 78: No
Prop. 79: No
Prop. 80: No
I don't think I've voted "yes" on so many ballot initiatives in my life.
Here in Orange County, the big vote is on Measure D, which would give the Orange County Fire Authority a portion of the future growth in Prop. 172 sales tax revenues. OC Blog has been tracking that imbroglio closely. Measure D is part of a package of four measures that would allot Prop. 172 revenues in various ways. They were put on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors in a deliberate effort to confuse voters and lead to their rejection of the whole lot -- thus diminish the chances that Measure D -- the firefighter union's initiative -- would pass.
I wasn't convinced of the wisdom of this strategy until I sat down last week to fill out my absentee ballot. I already planned to vote against Measure D. I don't think the firefighters union has made a genuine and convincing case about why they need the money.
As I slogged through dense thickets of jargony prose that are Measures B, C and E, it dawned on me that most voters will likely say, "The heck with it" and vote them all down. I'm a well informed voters who follows these issues on a daily basis, and I had a time decided on the alternatives. I didn't want to dedicate a portion of Prop. 172 revenues, but neither did I want to prohibit a future Board of Supervisors from including the OCFA in that bounty. So after a considerable amount of time, I voted "No" on all four.
In my opinion, most OC voters will make the same decision -- especially those casting their ballots today, standing in the voting booth and unwilling to spend long minutes slogging their own way through Measures B through E.
So my prediction: Measure D suffers a decisive defeat today, probably by 10-points.











































Comments
There are no comments.
Post a Comment
Not Registered Yet? Click Here
Forgot your Password? Click Here
Want to update your settings? Click Here
You must have a MyFlashReport Account to Comment.