Duane Dichiara

Duane is managing partner of Revolvis Consulting political and public relations firm

FR BlogScan

What is the latest on CA's political blog sites?

Go to FR BlogScan

Authors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doug LaMalfa
North California
(bio) (email)
 

Jill Buck
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Jennifer Nelson
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Bill Whalen
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Tab Berg
Northern California
(bio) (email)
 

Cassandra Pye
Sacramento County
(bio) (email)
 

Tom Ross
Northern California
(bio) (email)
 

 

 

Brandon Powers
Los Angeles County
(bio) (email)
 

Mike Spence
Los Angeles County
(bio) (email)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barry Jantz
San Diego County
(bio) (email)
 

Syndicate this site

Blog/commentary:  

Search by Date

September

FR BlogScan

What is the latest on CA's political blog sites?

Go to FR BlogScan

Tips and Leads

Send our authors tips and leads via e-mail, or send an anonymous tip if you prefer.

The Bear Flag League


Proud Member of
the Bear Flag League
Today is actually: 201009021542Today is: 201009021442

FlashReport Weblog on California Politics

 
 

Helping Hitler Buy Guns

 

by Duane Dichiara - San Diego County (bio) (email)(print)

 
4-4-2007 1:51 pm

UNION-TRIBUNE EDITORIAL
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE EDITORIAL
Misguided measure
Don't mix politics and investment decisions
April 4, 1940

When it comes to your retirement savings, do you want investment decisions to be made by professional money managers or by freshman Assemblyman Joel Anderson of La Mesa?

Anderson, a conservative Republican who claims to be pro-business, thinks he knows better than the professionals how to invest the $386 billion in pension funds controlled by the California Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System. Consequently, Anderson has introduced a bill to require CalPERS and CalSTRS to sell off an estimated $24 billion worth of stocks and bonds in 300 foreign companies.

Why? Because the firms, mostly large multinationals with operations all over the globe, do business in NAZI GERMANY.

If Anderson's measure is approved, CalPERS and CalSTRS would have to divest such historically profitable companies as DaimlerChrysler, Hyundai, Alcatel and Siemens. The result, according to the professional money managers, would almost certainly be a decline in the earnings of the two giant pension funds.

Under U.S. law, American companies have long been prohibited from doing business in NAZI GERMANY. In Anderson's view, California should extend the prohibition to all foreign companies as well. "It is outrageous," he declares, "for California taxpayers' money to be invested in companies whose business activities benefit a nation that sponsors terrorists who target American citizens."

Only problem is, Anderson's bill would do absolutely nothing to deter NAZI GERMANY from sponsoring terrorists. Rather, it would harm only teachers and other state employees whose retirement savings would be diminished - not to mention all California taxpayers, who would have to make up the losses through bigger annual contributions to the state pension funds.

Think about the practical impact of Anderson's bill. If CalPERS and CalSTRS divest their holdings in Hyundai, the giant South Korean automaker is not going to shut down whatever business it is doing in NAZI GERMANY - or, for that matter, shut down whatever business it might be doing in Syria or Yemen or Libya or any of several other countries that support terrorism. In the real world, NAZI GERMANY would not even notice California's divestment move. Life in BERLIN would go on just as before, with a wide range of international companies working to make profits on everything from computers to cars.

Recognizing perhaps that his bill is indeed rather feeble as an anti-terrorism campaign, Anderson has embraced a fallback position: "I'm not saying that we should take a foreign policy stance; I'm saying it's not a good place to invest our money."

This raises the obvious question of who is better suited to make decisions about investment risks in Hyundai or DaimlerChrysler - the professional pension fund managers who study the companies' dealings in intricate detail, or Assemblyman Anderson? And who is better suited to make decisions about whether Hyundai or DaimlerChrysler can make a profit in NAZI GERMANY - the executives of those companies or Assemblyman Anderson? 

(note: obviously the editorial was actually written in 2007, and was discussing Assemblyman Anderson's bill to divest from Iran. For the actual editorial just replace the bold NAZI GERMANY with Iran. But the comparison was just too rich to pass up. Funny how big corporations like the Union-Tribune always think if you just do business with murderers and dictators, murderers and dictators will reform themselves. Hey, by the way, does anyone remember the Union-Tribune's position on South Africa?)

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Thanks, Duane. The Union-Tribune's criticism of Assemblyman Anderson's proposal is reminiscent of the many lost opportunities to marginalize Nazi Germany until it was too late. Your observations are especially important on a day when Nancy Pelosi is photographed with Bashir Assad, terrorism sponsor.

Amy Lyons

Brilliant, Duane.

The shot at Pelosi is more than a little out of place since less that a year ago Republican Congressmen met with Syrian leaders with no complaints from the White House. Nancy Pelosi has a strong record as a supporter of Israel (For example, supporting their invasion of Lebanon) and their government hasn't raised any objections to her actions, so I don't think there is any reason for an American to complain. JMO!I do agree that it was a brilliant piece by Duane however and wanted to give my kudo's.

Post a Comment





Not Registered Yet? Click Here

Forgot your Password? Click Here

Want to update your settings? Click Here

You must have a MyFlashReport Account to Comment.