<![if !IE 6]> <![endif]>

Matthew J. Cunningham

Matt Cunningham is a principal in Pacific Strategies, in Orange County.

** NEW -- FR BlogScan**

What is the latest on CA's political blog sites?

Go to FR BlogScan

Authors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doug LaMalfa
North California
(bio) (email)
 

Jill Buck
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Jennifer Nelson
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Bill Whalen
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Tab Berg
Northern California
(bio) (email)
 

Cassandra Pye
Sacramento County
(bio) (email)
 

Tom Ross
Northern California
(bio) (email)
 

 

 

Brandon Powers
Los Angeles County
(bio) (email)
 

Mike Spence
Los Angeles County
(bio) (email)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barry Jantz
San Diego County
(bio) (email)
 

Syndicate this site

Blog/commentary:  

Search by Date

February

** NEW -- FR BlogScan**

What is the latest on CA's political blog sites?

Go to FR BlogScan

Tips and Leads

Send our authors tips and leads via e-mail, or send an anonymous tip if you prefer.

The Bear Flag League


Proud Member of
the Bear Flag League

FlashReport Weblog on California Politics

 
 

The 241 Toll Road & the Enviros Who Lie About It

 

by Matthew J. Cunningham - Orange County (bio) (email)(print)

 
8-31-2007 2:52 pm
One thing that amazes me about opponents of completing the 241 Toll Road in Orange County is how they lie, and the boldness with which they do it.

Take this press release from "Save San Onofre" containing a statement from Elizabeth Goldstein, the president of the California State Parks Foundation. It was given to me by an anti-241 activist at yesterday's pro-241 press conference by Rep. Ken Calvert and Assemblyman Van Tran.

In it, Goldstein claims:

"San Mateo Campground is a must see. Check out the 161 campsites that will be closed."

That is an untrue statement. Just a flat-out lie. Yet it slips so effortlessly from Ms. Goldstein's tongue.

Context is needed here and in anyone interested in more background can read my 241 toll road posts on FR Blog and on Red County/OC Blog. The state leases the parkland from the Department of the Navy, and the lease expires in 14 years.

But here's some quick background to put Goldstein's prevarication in perspective.

The selected completion route for the 241 toll road runs past San Mateo Campground -- the inland campground at San Onofre State Beach. 90% of San Onofre State Beach visitors don't go there, but to the beach campsite instead (although the anti-214 enviros muddle the distinction between the two in order to confuse the general public).

Completing the 241 will not close the San Mateo Campground. Nothing in the plans calls for the campground's closure.

The closest campsite to the 241 route is 385 feet away -- and there'll be a 16-foot soundwall.

By comparison, the beach campsite at San Onofore State Beach is 250 feet from Interstate 5 -- and there's no sound wall. Yet that is where the vast majority of San Onofre State Beach visitors go, a strong indication they don't think the I-5 destroys their recreational experience.

Defenders of Ms. Goldstein will claim she isn't lying, and point to a state parks department threat to close the campground if the 241 is completed (state parks director Ruth Coleman is a die-hard opponent of the 241).

But that would mean the state parks department -- not the completion of the 241 -- would be responsible for closing the campground. And it would be done out of spite, because Ms. Coleman doesn't see any need to close the popular San Onofre beach campground, which is even closer to the 1-5.

Oh well. Life goes on. The Earth keeps turning. The economy keeps growing. The government keeps taxing and spending. And 241 opponents keep lying.
Bookmark and Share

Comments

There are no comments.

Post a Comment





Not Registered Yet? Click Here

Forgot your Password? Click Here

Want to update your settings? Click Here

You must have a MyFlashReport Account to Comment.

 

Advertising Info

Download Macromedia Flash