Mike Spence

Mike serves on his local school board, and is Past President of the CA Republican Assembly.

FR BlogScan

What is the latest on CA's political blog sites?

Go to FR BlogScan

Authors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doug LaMalfa
North California
(bio) (email)
 

Jill Buck
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Jennifer Nelson
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Bill Whalen
San Francisco Bay Area
(bio) (email)
 

Tab Berg
Northern California
(bio) (email)
 

Cassandra Pye
Sacramento County
(bio) (email)
 

Tom Ross
Northern California
(bio) (email)
 

 

 

Brandon Powers
Los Angeles County
(bio) (email)
 

Mike Spence
Los Angeles County
(bio) (email)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barry Jantz
San Diego County
(bio) (email)
 

Syndicate this site

Blog/commentary:  

Search by Date

September

FR BlogScan

What is the latest on CA's political blog sites?

Go to FR BlogScan

Tips and Leads

Send our authors tips and leads via e-mail, or send an anonymous tip if you prefer.

The Bear Flag League


Proud Member of
the Bear Flag League
Today is actually: 201009021543Today is: 201009021443

FlashReport Weblog on California Politics

 
 

Los Angeles Loves Taxes: Well, most of the time.

 

by Mike Spence - Los Angeles County (bio) (email)(print)

 
7-1-2009 8:35 am

June's local school tax elections went 3 for 4. Yesterday La Canada Unified approved a parcel tax with over 70% of the Vote. They join Palos Verdes Peninsula and South Pasadena Unified in passing parcel taxes. Yours truly went 4 for 4 when Rowland Unified's attempt to pass a parcel tax got a little over 51% of the vote. Parcel taxes need a two-thirds vote to pass.

It seems that these votes were referendums on their local school districts. Most local taxes are viewed through that lens. Each of these communities had rejected 1A on May 19th. That was a referendum on the state.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

I live in PV and voted against the measure (despite having a kid in the system) as I believe all levels of government need to cut costs in this environment. That being said, I do understand why the measure passed and it is not a desire for more tax and spend policies. PVPUSD is one of the top districts in the state and is a source of local pride. By and large, the teachers and administrators are committed to providing an excellent product. They may be government employees, but they understand they are part of something special with high expectations and perform accordingly. The community recognizes this and strongly supports the district with fundraisers and volunteer activities.

Looking at the bottom line, PVPUSD is an asset that raises our home values. Folks who move to PV from areas served by sub par school district routinely comment how they save $20K/year that they would be forced to spend to send their kids to private schools. This, in turn, makes our homes more valuable and makes us wealthier. Local folks see it as an investment.

Put up a measure to fund government-sponsored "green jobs" (or some other left-wing fantasy) and it will get wiped out.

Post a Comment





Not Registered Yet? Click Here

Forgot your Password? Click Here

Want to update your settings? Click Here

You must have a MyFlashReport Account to Comment.