Get free daily email updates

Syndicate this site - RSS

Recent Posts

Blogger Menu

Click here to blog

Jon Fleischman

Democrats Commemorate Anniversary of Prop. 13 With Call For $6.4 Billion In New Taxes

It truly must be a terribly lopsided redistricting plan that allows the state legislature to be dominated with left-wing liberals who are so out of touch with the people of California.  On the same day that four separate surveys of public opinion on Proposition 13 show that Californians overwhelmingly support the Measure and its protections against higher taxes (Field, PPIC, Jarvis, and Cal-Tax), newly-minted Assembly Speaker Karen Bass has picked up the Fabian “Higher Tax Conch Shell” and yesterday unveiled an unfortunately predictable budget proposal on behalf of Assembly Democrats.  The unstable foundations of their plan are the same two balsa-wood pillars upon which they always stand – higher taxes and more spending.

In making her pronouncement that Assembly Democrats, in addition to embracing the Governor’s idea of expanding the state’s lottery and borrowing billions against its future anticipated earnings (though they propose spending this money differently than does the Governor), their plan calls for a staggering $6.4 billion in new taxes.  Yes, as we celebrate the protections of Proposition 13, the Democrats want to raise taxes in epic proportions.

Telling was this sentence in a prepared release issued by Speaker Bass: 

“We defined our values.  And then put forward a budget blueprint that reflects those values.  It’s exactly what families do when they figure out their budgets: figure out what they need and then figure out how to pay for it.”

That’s exactly the kind of mentality, embraced by decades of Democrats, that has put us in the overspending-induced financial quagmire in which we find ourselves today.

I don’t know how it works in Ms. Bass’ family – but the way it works in my family’s budget is that first we figure how much income my wife and I will bring in through our jobs, and investments.  Then based on what we will have available, we budget for a prudent reserve (for savings and retirement) – and then, using our “values and needs” as a guide, we then decide how we are going to spend the money that we have.  I have never heard of a family that sits around and dreams up their wish list of needs based on their “values” and then takes money from the budgets of other families to buy everything they want.

Assembly Republican Leader Mike Villines quickly responded to Bass’ call for billions in tax increases with a strong message that read, in part:

"We believe that building a budget based on a $6.4 billion dollar tax increase is a mistake and it ignores the Legislature’s responsibility to craft workable budget solutions. It is irresponsible for the liberal majority to make hard-working Californians pay for their over spending with tax increases. At a time when Californians are most concerned about jobs and the economy, and at a time when the price of gas and food is up and home values are down, it is pretty clear that people cannot afford to pay higher taxes.”

Political pundits today are talking about how far apart Democrats and Republicans are in terms of reaching a deal on a state budget.  They are correct. I think it is critical to point out that in terms of opposing new taxes (whether called “taxes, “revenues”, or “fees”), Republicans have sound public policy and strong public opinion on their side — and unity of purpose. 

At some point, Karen Bass and her fellow liberals in the legislature are going to have to face the same reality that an alcoholic does when they finally realize they have a tragic sickness.  The insatiable “need” to spend more than you have is an addiction, and legislative Democrats need serious therapy and a 12-step plan before productive budget talks can begin.

Care to read comments, or make your own about today’s Daily Commentary?

Just click here to go to the FR Weblog, where this Commentary has its own blog post, and where you can read and make comments.