
Unnecessary Divisiveness on Global Warming
When I was campaigning for the 18th AD, people asked me about my stance on abortion all the time. They wanted to hear me say pro-choice or pro-life, because they bought into the idea that a person had to be one or the other, and that divisive camps are somehow helpful. I disagree. This was my answer on abortion: “I’m Catholic, and I believe life is precious at every stage. I’d like to see abortion rates come down every year …but I’d like that to happen through freedom of choice. I’d like to do such a good job of supporting women through their reproductive choices that abortion becomes a product that womenno longer want to buy, but we don’t need to take it off the shelf to accomplish that.” By suggesting a free market solution vs. a mandated solution, I found that people who were pro-life and pro-choice could support my stance…and more importantly, they felt less need for a "pro-something" label, and more need to really engage in a freedom-based solution. They could see that while labels are convenient for those who need money, power, headlines, foot soldiers, and protesters – the fact is, those labels divide our country unnecessarily for the… Read More