Padres? No one cares, at least not today. In fact, just for one day, let’s also put aside the Angels, Dodgers, As and Giants. As well, the Yankees, Sox, Cubs and Rockies while we’re at it.

Who can possibly care about multi-million dollar salaries, questions about drug use, and coddling of giant egos, when real baseball can be watched?

A group of real players, the Park View Chula Vista Little Leaguers, have made it to the Big Show. Winning the U.S. title game 12-2 in Williamsport, PA yesterday, the Blue Bombin’ kidswill play for the Little League Championship of the World today (noon PST) against the veritable Yankees of the sport, Chinese Taipei.

Over the last several days, this group of boys has transitioned from a Chula Vista team to Team USA. San Diegans are enthralled by the title run, many Californians have taken notice and, today, all will stop as our eyes are on them.

Hope for our youth — and the purity of the game we once knew — springs eternal.

There is joy in… Read More

I’m handling a couple of political cases at the moment. One of them is a case with the Fair Political Practices Commission. The other is a case with the Federal Election Commission.

These two regulatory bodies, the FEC and the FPPC, try to impose campaign finance rules in Federal and California state election campaigns, respectively.

I know a little bit about these agencies. My wife worked as a lawyer at the FEC for four years during the Reagan/Bush administrations. And I actually handled my first FPPC case for a client, former Republican State Senator Dan O’Keefe, way back in 1979.

Well, I have learned that the current FPPC is not only diligent, but a lot easier to deal with than the FEC. In my FPPC case, the staff has been tough, accessible, and willing to negotiate a fair solution to the problem. They are going to get a fine paid from my client and we are happy to close the file.

On the other hand, the FEC is really annoying. They are attempting to impose a $6,000 fine on the client, because a name of a vendor was "too long" to be processed by the… Read More

The Tea Party is raging away. I just walked through it on the way to lunch. Quite a crowd in the boiling heat – I’d say 6,000 to 7,000. I was surprised at the number of Latinos – I’d estimate they were 20% of the raw numbers… maybe a little less. Ran into State Senator George Runner and Peter Foy by the stage. Since I was the only one of the six thousand some odd people in a suit they tried to avoid me. Fair numbers of police officers at the event. I’ll have to go to the next union rally and see if there are as many.… Read More

For those FR readers in the greater Sacramento Area — you should plan on participating in the big Tea Party rally outside of the State Capitol today from 12-5pm. More information is available here. I am excited to have an opportunity to speak at the rally, so my blogging may be light today as I have to travel up from "The OC" for this event at which well over 10,000 people are expected to attend! If you are an FR reader and you come to the event, please come say hello!… Read More

As 2010 approaches, I’ve be taking some time to handicap next year’s gubernatorial race. I will continue to comment on the Republican race as it develops but want to focus on the General Election next year and why Gavin Newsom’s nomination presents serious issues for Democrats in California.

As mayor of San Francisco, Newsom has consistently fallen into line with his city’s liberal political wing, most notably his support of same-sex marriage. Last year the voters showed they weren’t ready for that idea of Newsom’s.

But those in the know (as I am finding out) are aware of an issue that will be much tougher for Newsom to shake than gay marriage in a general election next year. Newsom has been a vocal supporter of San Francisco’s illegal “Sanctuary City” policy in which city officials are directed to NOT inform Federal immigration authorities when they detain or arrest an undocumented immigrant.

This policy, and Newsom’s steadfast backing of it, had real and deadly… Read More

As 2010 approaches, I’ve be taking some time to handicap next year’s gubernatorial race. I will continue to comment on the Republican race as it develops but want to focus on the General Election next year and why Gavin Newsom’s nomination presents serious issues for Democrats in California.

As mayor of San Francisco, Newsom has consistently fallen into line with his city’s liberal political wing, most notably his support of same-sex marriage. Last year the voters showed they weren’t ready for that idea of Newsom’s.

But those in the know (as I am finding out) are aware of an issue that will be much tougher for Newsom to shake than gay marriage in a general election next year. Newsom has been a vocal supporter of San Francisco’s illegal “Sanctuary City” policy in which city officials are directed to NOT inform Federal immigration authorities when they detain or arrest an undocumented immigrant.

This policy, and Newsom’s steadfast backing of it, had real and deadly… Read More

Yesterday Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner announced that he was filing a lawsuit against Governor Schwarzenegger’s Administration over a provision enacted in the July budget deal that would stop an illegal state raid of $1 billion in assets in the State Compensation Insurance Fund. Sound a bit confusing? I reached out to Poizner for some Q&A to walk FR readers through what the Commish is up to…

FlashReport: Can you explain the lawsuit you’re filing against the Schwarzenegger administration? Poizner I am filing a lawsuit today to stop the state’s planned $1 billion of State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) assets. The $1 billion transaction was authorized in the July state budget revision passed by the legislature and signed by the Governor. FR: What is SCIF? … Read More

I got a message from the Voter Registration Chairman for the Orange County Republican Party. She heard about the proposal I have put forward that says Republicans should choose Republican nominees for office. She was confused — she thought we already had that in place. (I can see where it is confusing, as the Presidential primary is open only to registered Republicans, but not the other races). She said that the party’s voter registration booths she encounters a great many people who are seriously thinking about re-registering from Republican to Decline To State. She’s been telling them that they should stay, and trying a number of arguments. But the most powerful and effective one? When she tells them that if they leave the party they can no longer vote in Republican primaries. That has been keeping a great many from leaving. Of course, it’s not true — and now she knows better so she can’t say that anymore. At least not for a few weeks…… Read More