Outside legal fee controversy brewing at Capo Unified
The statutory remedy for most common “Brown Act” open meeting violations is a simple “do-over” of the meeting in public. But if the government agency won’t acknowledge a violation, another feature of the Brown Act is that if you have to take them to court to prove the violation, and you win, a judge can order the “do-over” and you can get an award of attorneys fees for your trouble of having to bring the case. Or the DA can self-institute a criminal proceeding. I know a little about the Brown Act – I won a two-day trial against the Mission Viejo City Council years ago for clients for Brown Act violations the City would not acknowledge, and I won a contested attorney fee award, too. I also sued the Capistrano Unified School District a few years ago for a client on a Brown Act violation claim, held a deposition and did other discovery to prove the case, and was able to settle the case out of court, winning a court-approved stipulation agreement that Capo would record closed session meetings for a certain time period. I also was awarded attorney fees in that case. In those two cases, if the government agency had just… Read More