Recently I’ve been fascinated to read the Internet comments of otherwise intelligent people who think that the main cost of a costly California restaurant meal is the food ingredients.
Anyone who RUNS a restaurant will tell you that in most cases, the unprepared contents’ cost of what’s on your plate is just a minor and often tiny part of the restaurant’s overhead. Especially so for breakfast — which was the meal being discussed on the thread that I was reading.
Here are just SOME of the many restaurant costs being ignored by those commenting “economists,” claiming that some/most restaurants are ripping us off:
* Rent/lease/mortgage payments
* Cost of capital (loans or forgone earnings in one’s capital)
* Cost of the owner’s time (he usually forgoes a salary he could earn elsewhere)
* Taxes and government fees
* Insurance — especially workers’ comp
* Discount coupons
* Franchise fees (for the chains)
* Lawsuits (CA has the worst business lawsuit climate in the nation)
* Competition — fortunately for consumers, every business is seeking to “steal” other businesses’ patrons with lower prices, better products and/or better service. That open market competition keeps prices in check.
* Alternatives — such as eating at home. My wife and I seldom dine out any more, largely because the cost differential is so high (even before the pandemic). Here’s my SAN DIEGO U-T article on this:
Of course, these gourmet pundits are free to roll the dice with their own time and money. These critics should open a restaurant — thus taking a VERY expensive course in real world economics!
For me, what’s frightening is that no matter how ignorant a person is, their vote counts just as much as the wisest people on the planet. In large part, I credit this stunning lack of knowledge to our education system that pushes a collectivist, anti-business agenda. I’ve been appalled at what passes for “economics” in high school classes (I’ve spoken in hundreds of high school classes over 30 years).
BTW, one of the interesting (if unstated) “economic theories” is that California eatery owners are more greedy than restaurant owners in other states — states where restaurant prices are significantly lower. That’s how these financial “experts” implicitly explain the higher CA prices.
Indeed, for these folks, this bogus (but again, unstated) rationalization is too often the same for ALL the higher prices in California (think gasoline prices) — CA business owners must be more greedy than CEO’s in the other states. To say that this is an absurd hypothesis is an understatement. Yet “greedy businessmen” is a common refrain heard from the public to explain high California prices.
And everyone’s vote counts the same.