Posted by Barry Jantz at 12:00 am on Jan 07, 2007 8 Comments
When a newspaper makes an error that causes you heartburn, your
resulting choice is really not much of one,is it? If
the reporter or editor concurs that a mistake has indeed been made,
and thus agrees to run a printed correction or retraction, you know
that it will not get nearly the "play" the original offering did,
with only the most avid news readers actually seeing such
apologetic tidbits.
Alternatively, you could write a letter-to-the-editor,
correcting the mistake in greater detail and noting the actual
facts. Other than making you feel better, perhaps, this too
has its shortcomings. By appearance anything other than the
paper’s admission of error will simply look like your differing
opinion. As well, how many readers of the original piece will
actually get to the letters section of the editorial page?
You could sue. Uh-huh. Moving on, then…
It’s a catch-22, with the print news media in most cases in a
much stronger position than those they cover.
So, it’s nice to see a newspaper, even after a fairly egregious
and blatant error, taking action to own up, retract and apologize,
while displaying the… Read More