It appears that the back-room negotiated budget deal has hit a snag. Apparently in the area of cuts to the Department of Corrections, the Big 5 agreed in concept to an overall amount of cuts, but not in any degree of specificity to the exact cuts. As we all know, there has been a wide disagreement between the left and the right about how to make cuts (or whether to make cuts) to this part of the budget — Dems favoring reducing the prison population, some Republicans calling for other cuts in the Agency that don't impact prisoner population.

Apparently the thought was the the “epic debate” over this issue would be sorted out sometime after the rest of the deal was adopted.

From what I understand, word started to spread around the Capitol that Democrats were planning to, in fact, not leave these cuts “to be named later” and put up the cuts for a vote that would lead to over 30k inmates being released from prison earlier than the end of their sentences.

The bad news is that this puts a serious pause in the budget negotiations — but the good news is that the marketplace has rooted out a flaw in the plan. It… Read More

I wonder if legislative Democrats realize how good they got it in this current budget revision deal? When you consider the fact that state government has a shortfall of over a quarter of its current fiscal year general fund budget, and that raising taxes or fees were quite literally off the table, it was looking like this would be the "day of reckoning" for the big-spending liberals that have dominated state government for so many decades. After year after year of catering to the state’s massive public employee unions — and dropping a seemingly endless supply of other people’s money into one social program after another — somehow Senate President Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass pulled the proverbial rabbit out of the hat.

Let me say from the outset that we can thank the resolve of Governor Schwarzenegger and our Republican legislator that we do not have any tax increases in current budget deal. Clearly they were listening when taxpayers rejected the massive tax increases on the May special election ballot. The Governor also gets a lot of kudos for quickly coming out of the gate after that election with a… Read More

I wonder if legislative Democrats realize how good they got it in this current budget revision deal? When you consider the fact that state government has a shortfall of over a quarter of its current fiscal year general fund budget, and that raising taxes or fees were quite literally off the table, it was looking like this would be the "day of reckoning" for the big-spending liberals that have dominated state government for so many decades. After year after year of catering to the state’s massive public employee unions — and dropping a seemingly endless supply of other people’s money into one social program after another — somehow Senate President Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass pulled the proverbial rabbit out of the hat.

Let me say from the outset that we can thank the resolve of Governor Schwarzenegger and our Republican legislator that we do not have any tax increases in current budget deal. Clearly they were listening when taxpayers rejected the massive tax increases on the May special election ballot. The Governor also gets a lot of kudos for quickly coming out of the gate after that election with a… Read More

Orange County local elected officials will come together tomorrow to oppose the compromise budget deal. They call it a "Reckless and Irresponsible Ponzi scheme."

Already in this forum there is commentary on the League’s response.

Fleischman brings up an interesting point. Perhaps there ought to be an alternative organization that represents the interests of cities. I am thinking of a PAC, totally separate from governments yet funded via the efforts of local elected officials.

Smaller government is a great idea, but in the mean time, I trust local governments to spend my taxpayer dollars more than I trust the legislature. It is much easier to hold accountable the city council member I see in Synagogue or the water board member I run into at the super market.

I wish local elected officials had more clout in Sacramento. A fund raising vehicle that would support their interests would help.

Click below to see the full media advisory.

* * * NEWS CONFERENCE ADVISORY * * * Media Advisory: City Officials and Taxpayer Advocates Hold Press Conference Wednesday, July 22 at 2:00 p.m. to Condemn State Budget Deal… Read More

Those who have talked to me about it know that I have been stewing for a few weeks now about the vote of Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack in support of the national energy tax bill ("cap and trade") that narrowly passed through the House of Representatives. Astonishingly and in a most disappointing development, Republican Members of the House provided the margin of passage for what was hailed as Nancy Pelosi’s most important legislative achievement as Speaker. Because my brain is hard-wired to California politics, my angst is largely directed to Bono Mack, the only California Republican to vote for this terrible piece of legislation. The state budget crisis has provided me with a little bit of a distraction, and spared Rep. Bono Mack, thus far, of a pretty hard-hitting commentary from this website publisher.

That said, this morning I was perusing the Red County website, and came across what I would call a "must read" column from FR friend Chip Hanlon. Chip, a conservative who "gets it" has been providing solid leadership in my home county of Orange for many years, and I am pleased to say that he has started to provide some… Read More

Mr. Fleischman poses an interesting question in his post two below, specifically: Is there any statewide group out there that represents cities besides the League of California Cities? Let me attempt to answer.

Jon, although there are no other statewide groups that represent cities of which I am aware, there are a number of groups across the state that do in fact represent individual cities.

They are called city councils.

However, all too often these bodies and/or their individual members seem to march lockstep, herd mentality, with the consistent pro-tax philosophy of the "League."

All the more ironic, in that the League itself really doesn’t represent any taxpayers, at least not directly, while the city councilmembers most certainly do.

The reason I mention such heresy, is that I know there are dozens and perhaps hundreds of locally-elected city officials from throughout California that do in fact understand and realize the duplicityof a statewide association that admittedly does a pretty decent job in protecting… Read More

While Speaker Bass may be upbeat about a tentative Big 5 budget deal today, sanity still says that a long-term solution — over the next few years if not part of this budget — must include addressing the inherent inefficiencies in a bureaucracy gone mad. You know, what the Governor once called blowing up boxes.

As an example, FR friend Janelle Riella contacts us with this story…

My family is in the trucking business. When we receive renewal notices from the DMV, they are usually sent back to the DMV in bundles with one check for all of the vehicles. Just today, my mother received a note from the DMV that is was TOO EARLY to be paying the registration (the due date is September 2009), so they will be sending her a check back in the mail. The DMV sent her the renewal notice in the first place!! Now, they are going to reimburse her (which on average is $25 plusto get a check cut in the private sector) and she will have to turn around and pay the bill in August? They can’t just send her the new tags?

What is wrong with this state???? OK, for those thinkingthat… Read More

Everyone who lives in a city or a county who drives or rides in a car (that’s about everyone) should be concerned about this. As I have previously reported, a proposal by certain representatives of the Administration has potentially misled legislators into believing it’s o.k. to vote to take the local share of the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and Prop. 42 gas tax funds from cities and counties. The justification statement goes something like this: "Counties/Cities will be receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA-federal stimulus) funds anyways — which should be more than what we will be taking from Counties". This claim is misleading, to put it mildly. Take the case of San Bernardino County alone, which stands to lose (just for its unincorporated areas), 61% of what it costs to operate and maintain2,775 miles of roads. Thatis $47 million (HUTA take) and $7 million (Prop. 42 six-month deferral). The same unincorporated areas will receive only $5.8 million in ARRA federal stimulus funds. This means they’re planning to take ten times… Read More