The California Supreme Court will receive written arguments next week to set aside the open primary system scheduled to go into affect in special elections next year and in 2012 as a result of the passage of Proposition 14. A superior court judge and an intermediate appellate court have already essentially approved implementation of Proposition 14. The Supreme Court will hear a challenge driven largely by non-recognized minor party candidates who claim they are at a disadvantage as a result of the implementation law, known as Senate Bill 6, over the issue of "declaring party preference."
Under Proposition 14, candidates for partisan office who are registered in established political parties can essentially "hide the ball" from voters by not disclosing their party registration on the ballot. I have always felt that this was one of the biggest flaws in Proposition 14, because it give voters less information on the ballot, not more, about the candidate. I thought that might be a pretty good line of challenge, too. But the folks challenging the law are from parties that are not recognized, such as the "Coffee Party," and they are arguing that the rules force them to declare "no party preference" when they really do want to declare a preference for parties such as the "Coffee Party." I imagine that would include the "Rent is Too Damn High Party" as well.